Sunday, June 3, 2012

All About Apostrophes


Because alliteration is fun.
Alright, folks (or should I say “all right”?). This post is the last official post for my Senior Experience project. However, I’ve quite enjoyed creating this blog so far. So while I won’t continue to post daily, I may update with posts once every week or so.

First, I’d just like to start off with one of the most common mistakes that people make with regards to apostrophes. Putting an apostrophe and the letter s on the end of a singular word does NOT make it plural. It makes it possessive. Some of you might be reading this and thinking it’s obvious, but it is actually a surprisingly frequently made error.

Incorrect: I heard there are a lot of house’s for sale in that neighborhood.

Correct: I have yet to complete about ten homework assignments that were already due. Seniors.

Yes, that last one was, unfortunately, true.


The second thing I’d like to address about apostrophes is the confusion that arises when a word ends with the letter s and you want to make it possessive. Keep in mind, the only definitive rule of the following is rule #2. The others are more of stylistic choices, as there are several “correct” methods of forming the intended words. The following “rules” are more like guidelines (in the spirit of Captain Jack Sparrow) and are the stylistic choices that I personally make. Check out the resource links at the bottom of this post to see some other approved methods of forming the possessive version of words that end in s. The most important thing is that you remain consistent in how you choose to form the words.

1. If the word is singular and ends in s, add an apostrophe and additional s. (As previously mentioned, there are other correct methods to form such words. Some sources say that this depends on the sound of the s at the end of the word. Others say you can just add the apostrophe without the extra s.)
Example: James à I went to James’s house last weekend. [The house of James.]
Example 2: Mr. Jones à Mr. Jones’s daughter is going to prom with me. [The daughter of Mr. Jones.]

2. If the word, when singular, does not end in s but ends in s when plural, just add an apostrophe after the s to make the plural possessive.
Example: Girl(s) à I slept over in the girls’ bedroom. [The bedroom of the girls.]
Example 2: Apple(s) à The apples’ color was bright red. [The color of the apples.]

3. If the word, when singular, ends in s and you want to make its plural form possessive, add an es (to make it plural) and an apostrophe immediately after.
Example: The Jones Family à The Joneses’ new car already has a dent. [The car of the Joneses (their last name is Jones).]
Example 2: Bus(es) à The buses’ route to the party was interrupted by an accident. [The route of the buses (singular form is bus).]


The third and final concept of apostrophe use that I believe causes the most confusion is possession by more than one person (joint/compound possession). The person or thing that possesses something is known as a possessor. However, to make things simple, I’ll just use the word “people.”

1. If multiple people share in possessing one thing, add the apostrophe and s to the final person’s name, and make the object singular (or plural if they share more than one of the object being possessed).

Example: Joe and Marie’s cat jumped through a window. [Joe and Marie own the cat together, and it jumped out the window.]
Example 2: Joe and Marie’s two cats jumped through a window. [Joe and Marie own the two cats together, and both jumped out the window.]

2. If multiple people each possess their own of the same thing, each person gets his or her own apostrophe and the object should be plural.

Example 1: Joe’s and Marie’s cats jumped through a window. [Joe and Marie each own a cat, and both cats happened to jump through the window.]
Example 2: Joe’s and Marie’s two cats jumped through a window. [Many grammarians would interpret this to mean that Joe and Marie each own two cats, and all four cats happened to jump through the window.]


3. If one of the possessors is a personal pronoun (my, your, his, her, its, our, their), the other person gets an apostrophe and s, as well.

Example: My and Joe’s cat jumped through a window. [We share a cat and it jumped out the window.]

*No cats were harmed in the making of this post.


References and other links for more information:

Saturday, June 2, 2012

Are Those They? - Linking Verbs

This post was partially inspired by a conversation I had with someone last year in which he told me that a certain assistant principle from our school was quite impressed when he asked “Are those they?” when referring to a stack of papers.

Knock, knock.
Who’s there?
It’s me.

Not quite. The proper way to answer would actually be to say, “It is I.” And when asked, “Who did this?” the proper answer would be, “It is he.” And when asking if those particular papers are the ones you were meant to come collect, you should ask, “Are those they?” Yes, you may sound like an old, stodgy British butler, but at least you’ll be an old, stodgy, grammatically correct British butler. All of this is because “to be” is a linking verb.
            Think of a linking verb as doing just that— linking. It can link a subject to a noun, a pronoun, or an adjective. Consider it to be sort of like an equals sign, meaning whatever is on either side should be the same. So if the word before the conjugated form of “to be” is a subject, the word after (if it is a pronoun) should also be in the subject case (a.k.a. nominative case). Subject form = subject form.

What are the subject and object pronouns? The subject pronouns in English are I, you, he, she, it, we, you, they, what, who. The object pronouns are me, you, him, her, it, us, them, what, whom.

Incorrect: I am her
Breakdown: I (subject) am (conjugated form of “to be”) her (object form of pronoun)

Correct: I am she
Breakdown: I (subject) am (conjugated form of “to be”) she (subject form of pronoun)

Incorrect: These are them
Breakdown: These (subject) are (conjugated form of “to be”) them (object form of pronoun)

Correct: These are they
Breakdown: These (subject) are (conjugated form of “to be”) they (subject form of pronoun)


But the forms of “to be” aren’t the only linking verbs. Any form of “become” or “seem” qualifies as a linking verb. And there are roughly twenty other words that can be a linking verb if the context is right; if not a linking verb, they act as action verbs (conveying an action taking place). These include appear, look, feel, remain, sound, and taste. Check out the links (pun not intended) at the end of this post for more examples. The rule of thumb for checking to see if these words are considered linking words in specific cases is to replace the verb with a form of “to be” (is, are, was, were, etc.).* If the sentence stills makes sense, then the verb would be considered a linking verb in that context. If it does not make sense, it is an action verb in that context. If it is a linking verb and the following word is a noun or an adjective, then there is nothing to double check. But if the word that follows is a pronoun, you would then need to make sure that it is in the subject form.

Example: She feels elated. à She is elated. [This sentence makes sense, so “feels” is a linking verb, followed by an adjective.]

She feels the weight of the book in her hand. à She is the weight of the book in her hand. [This sentence does not make sense, so in this case, “feels” is an action verb.]


*This method will not work with the word “appear” or any of its forms.


References and other links for more information:

Commonly Used Phrases... That Don't Actually Exist


This is sort of like a part II to the post about words that aren’t actually correct. But this time, it’s sentences…

1. For all intensive purposes
What you should be saying: For all intents and purposes. This one came about because the two phrases sound alike when said aloud. However, there is no such thing as an “intensive purpose.” The correct phrase means “for all practical purposes; in every practical sense” [1]. Yes, “intents” and “purposes” are basically synonymous in this saying, and having them both there is unnecessary and creates confusion that likely contributes to the incorrect phrasing. But, no matter how ridiculous you may think it is to use such a redundant statement, you’ll sound even more ridiculous saying it incorrectly.

2. I could care less
What you should be saying: I couldn’t care less. This one is just a simple case of using common sense. The phrase is meant to express the sentiment that one is not concerned about something. But if you could care less, that means that you have to care to some extent in the first place, negating the intent (and purpose ;P) of the phrase. On the other hand, saying you couldn’t care less implies that you don’t care whatsoever in the first place, so it is not within your ability to care any less about the matter at hand. Alternatively, you could always use the slang, “I give absolutely no flucks*.” That pretty sufficiently gets the point across.

3. Me either
What you should be saying: Me neither. Though technically, that isn’t the best construction, either (pun not intended). The best phrase to use is nor I or neither do I or neither/nor can I. But because, as a grammarian, you sometimes have to pick your battles, I’d suggest that you use “me neither.” Because at least that one is somewhat correct (depending on whom you ask). In summary: When trying to agree with a negative statement, you should use “neither” because it incorporates the negative.

Incorrect: -I can’t go today.
                - Me either.

Correct: -I don’t like it.
              -Me neither.

4. Hone in
What you should be saying: Home in. “Hone” means to sharpen, as in “honing your skills.” “Homing” in on something means to aim or focus on a target. To remember this one, think of a homing pigeon or a homing device, which aim for something specific.

5. Begs the question
What you (probably) should be saying: Raises the question. “Begging the question” has a Latin equivalent: petitio principii, or, "postulation of the beginning" [2,3]. In other words, it is a logical fallacy that refers to a circular argument. In other other words, it means to use part of the concept of an argument to prove itself. It does not mean, despite some people’s insistence to the contrary (Robin, this sentence goes out to you!), that something creates or poses a question to be answered. So better to go for the simple wording and avoid looking like a fool when someone calls you out on it.

*By flucks, I think you know what I mean…

References and other links for more information:
 
 
Copyright © It's Grammar Time